Illospace vs Gemini Enterprise Agents
Side-by-side comparison of Illospace and Gemini Enterprise Agents. Compare features, pricing, and reviews to find the best fit.
Illospace vs Gemini Enterprise Agents: Our Analysis
Illospace and Gemini Enterprise Agents are both other tools competing in the same space, but they take fundamentally different approaches. Illospace positions itself as "A free, open-source workspace where your team and always-on AI agents share one memory", while Gemini Enterprise Agents describes itself as "Google Cloud's agent-builder platform with prebuilt enterprise connectors, per-task pricing, and first-class observability".
On pricing, Illospace uses a Free (open-source, s model while Gemini Enterprise Agents offers paid pricing. This is an important distinction — Illospace requires a paid subscription, whereas Gemini Enterprise Agents is a paid tool from the start.
Gemini Enterprise Agents leads in user ratings at 4.4/5 compared to Illospace's 4.0/5. However, ratings don't tell the full story — Illospace may excel in specific use cases that matter more to your workflow.
Illospace highlights 6 key features including multiplayer canvas workspace shared by humans and ai agents and always-on agents with persistent access to team memory and context. Gemini Enterprise Agents counters with 8 features, notably prebuilt enterprise connectors for salesforce, workday, servicenow, sap, slack, microsoft 365, and google workspace and per-task pricing at $0.002 per agent step plus gemini token costs — predictable cost-per-outcome model.
The standout advantage of Illospace is "genuinely free and open-source — you can self-host and audit it", while Gemini Enterprise Agents's strongest point is "per-step pricing ($0.002) makes cost-per-outcome easy to forecast versus per-seat models like copilot studio". On the flip side, Illospace users should be aware that "early-stage — launched mid-may 2026, no managed cloud tier or slas yet", and Gemini Enterprise Agents users note that "pricing is unpredictable in practice — agents that retry tool calls can rack up steps faster than expected".
The right choice between Illospace and Gemini Enterprise Agents depends on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Illospace's trial options, and explore Gemini Enterprise Agents's pricing. Read our detailed reviews linked below for the full breakdown of each tool.
Illospace
A free, open-source workspace where your team and always-on AI agents share one memory.
Gemini Enterprise Agents
Google Cloud's agent-builder platform with prebuilt enterprise connectors, per-task pricing, and first-class observability.
| Feature | Illospace | Gemini Enterprise Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Category | other | other |
| Pricing | Free (open-source, s | paid |
| Rating | 4.0 | 4.4 |
| Verified | — | — |
Illospace Features
- Multiplayer canvas workspace shared by humans and AI agents
- Always-on agents with persistent access to team memory and context
- Agents can create databases, schedule cron jobs, and build workspace apps
- Unified surface for ideas, threads, team chat, and dynamic interfaces
- Fully open-source, self-hostable full stack (github.com/Illospace/illospace)
- Free with no per-seat pricing
Gemini Enterprise Agents Features
- Prebuilt enterprise connectors for Salesforce, Workday, ServiceNow, SAP, Slack, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace
- Per-task pricing at $0.002 per agent step plus Gemini token costs — predictable cost-per-outcome model
- Free tier of 10,000 agent steps per month for evaluation and small workloads
- Built-in agent observability with step-by-step trace, token spend per task, and tool-call timing
- Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash both available as the agent's reasoning backbone
- Drag-and-drop agent builder plus a code-first SDK in Python and TypeScript for the same agent definitions
- Native A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol support for multi-agent coordination across Google and partner agents
- VPC-SC, IAM, and CMEK support — meets the same controls as the rest of Google Cloud
Illospace Pros
- Genuinely free and open-source — you can self-host and audit it
- Agents share one persistent memory instead of starting cold every chat
- Agents can act (create databases, cron jobs, apps), not just answer questions
- No per-seat pricing, unlike most team-workspace tools
- Single surface replaces several fragmented apps
Illospace Cons
- Early-stage — launched mid-May 2026, no managed cloud tier or SLAs yet
- Self-hosting requires running and maintaining your own infrastructure
- Agent system tools (cron, databases) are powerful but young and lightly documented
- Smaller ecosystem and community than established workspace tools
Gemini Enterprise Agents Pros
- Per-step pricing ($0.002) makes cost-per-outcome easy to forecast versus per-seat models like Copilot Studio
- Connector library is the deepest in the enterprise-agent market — 40+ first-party integrations at launch
- Observability is best-in-class: full step trace, latency, token spend, and tool-call timing in one console
- Sits on top of Vertex AI infrastructure — same VPC-SC, IAM, and CMEK controls as the rest of Google Cloud
- A2A protocol means your Gemini agents can coordinate with non-Google agents without lock-in
Gemini Enterprise Agents Cons
- Pricing is unpredictable in practice — agents that retry tool calls can rack up steps faster than expected
- Drag-and-drop builder is more limited than Copilot Studio's UI; serious work happens in the Python/TS SDK
- Gemini 3.1 Pro lags GPT-5.5 on Terminal-Bench by ~10 points, so deeply agentic coding loops still favor OpenAI
- Tightest integrations are with Google Workspace — Microsoft 365 connectors exist but are noticeably thinner
- Documentation is fragmented across Vertex AI, Agent Builder, and Gemini Enterprise — discoverability is rough